<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Health care bill: would Stupak pass if we had more women?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://womenandpolitics.org/archives/bittersweet-healthcare/1604/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://womenandpolitics.org/archives/bittersweet-healthcare/1604</link>
	<description>A blog from WCF about the state of women and politics</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 06:31:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Women and Politics &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Sen. Barbara Boxer speaks out against Nelson amendment</title>
		<link>http://womenandpolitics.org/archives/bittersweet-healthcare/1604#comment-5143</link>
		<dc:creator>Women and Politics &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Sen. Barbara Boxer speaks out against Nelson amendment</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 15:51:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://womenandpolitics.org/?p=1604#comment-5143</guid>
		<description>[...] health choices was launched last night by Sen. Ben Nelson (D-NE). His amendment mirrors that of the Stupak-Pitts amendment that was shamefully passed in the House health care [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] health choices was launched last night by Sen. Ben Nelson (D-NE). His amendment mirrors that of the Stupak-Pitts amendment that was shamefully passed in the House health care [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Women and Politics &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Women Lead the Charge for Comprehensive Health Care</title>
		<link>http://womenandpolitics.org/archives/bittersweet-healthcare/1604#comment-4804</link>
		<dc:creator>Women and Politics &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Women Lead the Charge for Comprehensive Health Care</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 17:31:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://womenandpolitics.org/?p=1604#comment-4804</guid>
		<description>[...] applies to women, so it makes sense that women are leading the opposition to it. If only there were more women in Congress, perhaps we wouldn&#8217;t have an amendment to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] applies to women, so it makes sense that women are leading the opposition to it. If only there were more women in Congress, perhaps we wouldn&#8217;t have an amendment to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Women and Politics &#187; Blog Archive &#187; AG Coakley: A Champion for Women</title>
		<link>http://womenandpolitics.org/archives/bittersweet-healthcare/1604#comment-4728</link>
		<dc:creator>Women and Politics &#187; Blog Archive &#187; AG Coakley: A Champion for Women</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 21:09:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://womenandpolitics.org/?p=1604#comment-4728</guid>
		<description>[...] &#171; Health care bill: would Stupak pass if we had more women? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &laquo; Health care bill: would Stupak pass if we had more women? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
