<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stand with women and against Stupak</title>
	<atom:link href="http://womenandpolitics.org/archives/stand-against-stupak/1717/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://womenandpolitics.org/archives/stand-against-stupak/1717</link>
	<description>A blog from WCF about the state of women and politics</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 04:06:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Women and Politics &#187; Blog Archive &#187; A rallying cry: We need more women candidates</title>
		<link>http://womenandpolitics.org/archives/stand-against-stupak/1717#comment-6667</link>
		<dc:creator>Women and Politics &#187; Blog Archive &#187; A rallying cry: We need more women candidates</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 21:41:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://womenandpolitics.org/?p=1717#comment-6667</guid>
		<description>[...] recent narrow defeat of the Stupak-Pitts amendment and Martha Coakley&#8217;s loss in the Massachusetts special election, there is no better [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] recent narrow defeat of the Stupak-Pitts amendment and Martha Coakley&#8217;s loss in the Massachusetts special election, there is no better [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Women and Politics &#187; Blog Archive &#187; For health care, for women, for all Americans, we need Coakley</title>
		<link>http://womenandpolitics.org/archives/stand-against-stupak/1717#comment-6208</link>
		<dc:creator>Women and Politics &#187; Blog Archive &#187; For health care, for women, for all Americans, we need Coakley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 15:58:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://womenandpolitics.org/?p=1717#comment-6208</guid>
		<description>[...] at a time when legislation directly affecting women’s health is being debated. As the Stupak and Nelson amendments demonstrated, the lack of female perspective is severely damaging to the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] at a time when legislation directly affecting women’s health is being debated. As the Stupak and Nelson amendments demonstrated, the lack of female perspective is severely damaging to the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
